I am currently running BI on a desktop with an Intel and 16GB RAM. Before I jump into Xeoma, whether in a docker on my unRAID (yes I do have one) or any other machine, can any of you Xeoma users that have had experience with Zoneminder or Blueiris give me a reasonably fair review/comparison of the software? and neglected to disclose that little fact in the post. A fellow posted a glowing review of Xeoma on a camera forum and got his doors blown off when they uncovered that he had been given free licenses by Xeoma for multiple (favorable) blog posts. I know this is not a forum for Xeoma, but I am gently trolling the interwebs for a replacement for Blueiris and I stumbled on it. Please tell me what I might be doing wrong. Jul 31 08:42:44 ECSERVER shfs/user: err: shfs_rmdir: rmdir: /mnt/disk1/CAMERAS/Records/Enzo-Creation-Entrance/ (39) Directory not empty Jul 31 08:42:44 ECSERVER shfs/user: err: shfs_rmdir: rmdir: /mnt/disk1/CAMERAS/Records/Enzo-Creation-Window/ (39) Directory not empty I understand that it might need to remove some footages based on the archive settings "Storage time for this archive" which btw I have set to 1 week, but at the moment it's trying to delete all the records since Xeoma has been setup: What I don't understand is why Xeoma docker is trying to delete these folders in the first place since they contain the records from the cameras? I've checked for dot files (apple dstores) but there are none in the folders affected. I have dozens of those and i'm not too sure if that is a big issue or not since everything else seems to be working properly. Jul 28 08:53:28 ECSERVER shfs/user: err: shfs_rmdir: rmdir: /mnt/disk1/CAMERAS/Records/Enzo-Creation-Entrance/ (39) Directory not empty The only thing that is a bit weird is that those lines keeps showing in my unraid sys log: it works great and made my life super easy. Then I can filter the archive based on what motion sensor was triggered (front door, driveway, living room, etc) which makes it really quick to find something.įirst of all thank you very much for this docker. I was able to setup a camera to trigger using my PIR motion sensors (via HTTP Switch module) or the motion sensing built into Xeoma and mark them in the archive accordingly (by chaining the modules together). The support is pretty decent as well, usually responding within 1-2 business days. So you can buy a 4 and a 2 camera license and activate both to get 6 cameras. I'm running 6 cameras right now with a license for 8 (plan on adding more in the future). Runs even better via a docker on unraid then it did in Ubuntu (headless) on the same prefer Xeoma because of the Linux support. Thanks updating this quick and responding to my issues on github promptly. Specifically resource management in a Linux system, some pretty nice workflow set ups, and I get less false alarms now. So to answer your question, it's better at some things than Blue iris. Blue iris also charged for one of it's major updates if I remember correctly a few versions back. The updates are included for 1-3 years depending what you purchase. ![]() I'm planning to pick up my 4th camera this week, then I'll have to decide what I want to do about licensing. In other words, for my specific scenario, it just works better. ![]() I also have a huge decrease in ram utilization. I liked it but I literraly air at 1% cpu usage with Xeoma in idle. However blue iris in a VM was less than ideal. I only purchased a 4 camera license, so my cost wasn't much different from blue iris, though I do own both. I just went to Xeoma's website, and its more costly than Blue Iris, plus I have to *buy* updates after a period of time? OK. I realize this probably isn't the proper thread for asking this, so forgive me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |